The South Korean Android leader has made their Galaxy K Zoom official. In other words it’s the Galaxy S5 Zoom just like its predecessor Galaxy S4 Zoom but this time with a different naming approach. The Galaxy K Zoom comes with features for which it can be prefixed as the “SELFIE CAMERA”.

Key hardware features are:

· 4.8” Super AMOLED Screen @ 1280X720
· Hexacore processor 1.3Ghz quad core +1.7 dual core
· 2 GB ram
· 8GB internal expandable up to 64 GB
· 4G LTE
· 2,430mAH battery
· 20.7 MP BSI CMOS lens
· 10X zoom
· Optical Image Stabilization
· Full HD 1080p Recording
· Xenon Flash




Available in Blue, Black & White Colors

Key Software features:

· 4.4 Kit Kat – out of the box
· Auto Focus & Auto Exposure Separation
· 5 Optimized Filter Settings
· Selfie Alarm – For efficient Selfies
· Object Tracking – For clearer shots of moving objects

The overall design has improved from its predecessor making it more tempting to own. At last the company has provided us with a device worth owning for its specs and the making it more easy to handle thereby giving Nokia Lumia 1020 a hard time in future!!

The only problem Samsung has been facing since the very launch of the Galaxy Camera is the no. of very few limited customers. Because when it comes to hardcore photography no one would shoot with it but rather a DSLR. If you visualize the customer segment it’s either few Crazy Tech Lover or the Reporters who need to immediately send the pics to head office after clicking (just visualizing!!!)

So if you wanna have photography + android + Touch Wiz features in one package Samsung Galaxy K Zoom is your piece of Cake!!!


The smartphone market (till 2013) has been ruled and crowded by the few big-time OEMs namely Samsung, HTC, Apple, Sony and even Motorola. We’ve also seen companies like DELL, HP and Lenovo try their hand at the smartphone market.
But what has been the trend so far, is of companies making flagship devices with similar top of the line specs and classy builds (Well not always, Samsung- Take A Note). More often than not, the flagships have dizzyingly exorbitant prices which, in today’s day are not for the common man.  Take for example the Samsung Galaxy S5 which will cost you $699.99 on Amazon for the 16GB version while the HTC One M8 shall cost you $649.99 for the Gunmetal Grey 32GB version again on Amazon. The Other competitors are no less with devices priced similarly.
Come in 2014, and we are beginning to see a number of Chinese Smartphone Manufacturers trying to break the clout of major OEMs and come out in the spotlight. And what pleases us geeks more than brilliant devices at reasonable prices.
The last week alone has seen the official announcement of the OnePlus One ‘flagship killer’ and big news from Xiaomi – three new products and an expansion of device sales to 10 new countries.
Xiaomi started out building Android powered smartphones back in 2011. Despite stellar sales in China, Xiaomi’s official global sales have really only managed to expand to Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore. In a recent announcement, Xiaomi shared their plans to expand to ten new countries by the end of the year, including new markets like Brazil, India, the Philippines and Russia, Xiaomi puts themselves in front of millions of new users.
Xiaomi’s new devices announced this past week do not include smartphones or tablets. With a new WiFi router, Chromecast-competitor media unit and a full blown media server with 1TB of storage, Xiaomi works to expand the ecosystem in your home around your Xiaomi Android powered devices.

 

Another Chinese smartphone manufacturer that we see making waves on a global scale is a company called OPPO. OPPO has been selling their Find 5 smartphone for a while, added the N1 a while back, announced the updated Find 7 in March and just announced an NFC lense-style camera.
Should the ‘big’ Android phone manufacturers be scared?
Simply put, OnePlus, OPPO and Xiaomi are hungry companies, looking to stir the pot and compete on the international level. They are continuing a trend that Google has been pushing of late with their Nexus line of devices, making top-notch devices and selling them for affordable prices. Let’s take a look at what these three are bringing to the table:

OnePlus One – starting at $299.00


With the mantra of “never settle,” the OnePlus One is one of the most powerful device on the market right now. With the 2.5GHz Snapdragon 801 processor, 3GB of RAM, a 5.5-inch 1080p screen and a slew of other specs that make us swoon, we very much enjoyed reviewing this unit at the official launch this past week. There is some debate that OnePlus failed to deliver on all of their promises for the Cyanogen powered One. Even with a few shortcomings, there is no question that this is one of the best phones for its price, and possibly one of the most sought after devices of the year.

OPPO Find 7 – starting at $499.00


OPPO offers two variants of their new Find 7 Android powered smartphone. With many similar specs, the higher end of the two sports the 2.5 GHZ Snapdragon 801 processor, 3GB of RAM and a 5.5-inch display. Sounds pretty familiar so far. OPPO has gone ahead and rocked the boat by using that 5.5-inch display to throw Quad HD at you. That’s 2560 x 1440 resolution, for 538 ppi. Checkout our hands-on to get all the details, but rest assured, the OPPO Find 7 is an impressive device.

Xiaomi – Mi 3 and Redmi Note – starting at $327 and $129


Xiaomi may not be in the race for the most powerful devices around, but with a starting point of just $129 for the Redmi Note, it is no wonder that the company has two phones on top 10 sales lists. The 5-inch, Snapdragon 800, 2GB RAM Xiaomi Mi 3 first launched last year. Sales expanded to Singapore in early 2014, marking the first stage in their global expansion led by ex-Googler Hugo Barra.
Xiaomi is looking to expand its Hongmi line, which was renamed Redmi for sales outside of China. The Redmi Note will be available for sale next month in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, with 10 new markets anticipated later later this year. The Redmi Note packs 2GB of RAM on a 1.7GHz processor for $159, or drop down to the 1.4GHz processor for $129.

There are plenty of other smartphone manufacturers around the globe that have been positioning themselves to put phones in pockets. We hope to see big things from Alcatel, Blu and ASUS soon. Lenovo is another name we should keep eyes on, with their recent acquisition of Motorola, the two combined stand to make a significant dent in the global smartphone market. So far, it may be hype more than sales numbers, but 2014 is proving to be a big year for Chinese smartphone Manufacturers.






Along with redesigning Android app icons, it looks like Google has more plans to revamp their mobile OS, and that involves changing the Home button into a “Google” button.





According to Android Police, Google is planning to experiment with new navigation buttons, with the back button working as it always has, the multitasking button, and the Google button triggering a search prompt from wherever you are. To get back to the home screen, you’d have to use the multitasking button, which sounds pretty inconvenient to me. Looks like Google is following Microsoft here, who has forced all Windows Phone OEMs to include a Bing Search button on all their devices. In Google’s case the branding is even more prominent. Then again, this just might be a rumor that doesn't work out.


Another report from the same source is that Google wants to make their “Ok Google” voice command an even deeper part of Android, no longer constrained to just the home screen or Search app. Instead, Google wants voice control to extend to a wide variety of individual apps, making it ‘Everywhere.’ The hope is apparently to make users more familiar with voice commands.


Google I/O is just a couple months away so I guess we’re going to have to wait until then to find out if this is all true. If it is, there’s big changes coming to Android, eh?

Once SamsungHTCSony and LG threw down their proverbial gauntlets earlier this year, everybody assumed the coast would be clear for the four to duke it out amongst themselves for the Android crown through the summer at the very least.
OnePlus-One-Vs-Galaxy-S5
But boy, were we wrong. Up-and-coming Oppo was the first to try to crack the elite, which they may well succeed if distribution isn’t a problem, and absolute rookie OnePlus is on the verge of remodeling conventional tech business models with a unique blend of affordability, cutting-edge performance and cheap, shrewd, untraditional marketing.
Sure, they’re noobs, automatically making them untrustworthy for the day-to-day mobile user. On top of that, the HQ is set in China, and shoddy build quality-centric myths and preconceptions still galore vis-à-vis Middle Kingdom-based OEMs.
OnePlus-One-Vs-HTC-One-M8
Last but not least, OnePlus’ resources (or lack thereof) is likely to prevent them from achieving their mighty world domination goals, as OnePlus One orders are at this time conditioned by a controversial invite system.
Then again, it’s not all doom and gloom for Pete Lau & co., or else we wouldn’t be having this discussion in the first place. Their dependability is validated by not only Lau’s name and reputation as a former Oppo higher-up, but also by CyanogenMod and Steve Kondik’s involvement. I mean, come on, do you really think Mr. Cyanogen himself would endorse a cheapo, shabby piece of China-produced plastic?
OnePlus One
No way, so stop worrying. Instead, let’s pit the OnePlus One against the Samsung Galaxy S5 and HTC One (M8) in a numbers war to see who prevails. No marketing mumbo-jumbo, no brand awareness BS, no supply and demand crap. Just three spectacular Android handhelds in a cold, objective numbers duel:

One Plus One vs Galaxy S5 vs HTC One (M8) – design comparison

Okay, so evaluating designs 100 percent objectively is virtually impossible. But impartially comparing product dimensions isn’t. Let’s see. The OnePlus One offers by far the largest screen real estate, so naturally, it’s the tallest and widest phone too.
Specifically, it’s 152.9 mm tall and 75.9 wide, compared with 142 x 72.5 (Galaxy S5) and 146.4 x 70.6 (One M8). Meanwhile, it’s slightly thicker than the S5 (8.9 vs 8.1 mm), yet thinner than the M8 (9.4 mm). Finally, heavier than both its rivals, at 162 grams (vs 145 and 160 respectively).
Galaxy S5 vs OnePlus One
Wait, only two grams bulkier than HTC’s latest One? That’s incredible. And mind you, it’s no fluffy piece of plastic, with a chassis wrapped in smooth, sturdy magnesium. As far as overall design language goes, the OnePlus One is definitely unique in its simplicity and minimalism, featuring absolutely no embellishments.
It’s rectangular, it’s nearly curve-free, somewhat elegant and very low-key… in a good sense. All in all, you’re more likely to pick the GS5 out of a lineup, and M8’s all-aluminum build is unrivaled, but the OnePlus One is not far behind in aesthetical grandeur.

Display comparison

Full HD vs Full HD vs Full HD. How to set these vibrant devices apart? Well, once again, the OnePlus One has the biggest usable glass, which is an upside for some and downside for many. Pixel density-wise, the underdog is overpowered by the two front-runners: 401 ppi vs 432 and 441 respectively.
OnePlus_One_HTC_One_M8
But that’s way too little to establish beyond the shadow of a doubt GS5 and M8’s panels are superior to OnePlus One’s screen. And sure, the S5 was recently named the smartphone with the best performing display around, however in all honesty most everyday users can’t tell any difference between its image reproduction, contrast and viewing angles and those delivered by the One M8.

Processing speed, RAM and cameras

It’s mind-boggling how OnePlus can trounce HTC and Samsung’s hardware configurations and ask half of what the two charge for their newest flagships. I get it, the noobs don’t care about profits… right now, but don’t they need to eat?
oneplus-one-black
Probably not, as they found enough resources to pack a state-of-the-art quad-core 2.5 GHz Snapdragon 801 processor, Adreno 330 GPU and 3 GB RAM inside a $300 handheld. The CPU/GPU combo is the same that Samsung uses, but the S5 comes 1 gig short in the RAM department. Meanwhile, the M8 also carries 2 GB random-access memory, plus a Snapdragon 801 chip clocked a little lower – 2.3 GHz.
The cameras are a touchy subject until OnePlus One reviews and tests start to pile up, but on paper, everything looks good for Pete Lau’s outfit. The rear snapper touts 13 megapixels, dual LED, autofocus and f2.0 aperture and the front cam is ideal for selfies, with a 5 MP sensor.
OnePlus-One-2
The secondary shooter is at worst tied with M8’s and better than S5’s, whereas the rear camera should perform more or less the same as HTC’s system and slightly worse than Samsung’s. Slightly.

Software and battery life comparison

Look, I dig what Samsung’s been up to with TouchWiz lately as much as the next guy, and even HTC’s Sense has come a long way. But no skin is always better than any skin. Even better, no skin with a caboodle of customization options.
Enter OnePlus One’s Android 4.4 KitKat-based CyanogenMod 11S, guaranteed for timely updates until the end of time, tinkerer-friendly and just all-around awesome.
CyanogenMod
Battery life? Like camera performance, it’s really hard to rate with no real-life evaluations to rely on. Sure, in theory, a 3,100 mAh juicer should be enough to keep the lights on a good continuous 16 hours or so regardless of how power-demanding the S801 is.
However, both the S5 and M8 have shown tremendous stamina in reviews and battery tests, despite their ticker capacities coming in at 2,800 and 2,600 mAh respectively. So yeah, I’m pretty sure the OnePlus One will impress in autonomy, but won’t stick my neck out to predict better endurance than its competition.

Storage, connectivity, pricing and others

Before getting to the final chapters of this epic battle, let’s do a quick recap. The OnePlus One is unmistakably the stronger contender of the three in processing speed and RAM, it features a top-shelf front-facing camera, massive battery, smooth, highly customizable software, minimalistic, elegant design, five-star display and, at worst, decent rear snapper.
OnePlus-One-back
Add in a starting price of $300 outright, which is literally half of S5 and M8’s market value, and the buying decision is a no-brainer. Yeah, yeah, yeah, you get no water or dust protection, fingerprint sensor, heart rate monitor or microSD card slot.
But there’s 4G LTE support and everything else you need connectivity-wise. Plus, JBL-designed stereo speakers. And in case you need north of 16 GB storage (which you probably do), the 64 GB variant costs $350. Contract and SIM-free. Where do I get an invite again?




HTC hasn't managed to produce a hit phone in years, and not just in the premium segment. The company has launched some great phones - last year's One being the most obvious example - but none of them have really managed to become popular. Once almost synonymous with Android, HTC's market share now pales in comparison to Samsung's.

The One (M8) owes its curious name to the indecision and confusion that has characterised HTC's development and marketing efforts for the past few years. It's meant to supersede the One as HTC's flagship, but we suppose this is better than calling it the HTC Two (or even worse, the One 2).

In a sea of mostly white plastic, last year's One and this year's One (M8) stand out with their metal bodies and solid look. Considering that this wasn't enough to help HTC climb out of the doldrums last year, does the M8 have enough firepower to succeed where its predecessor failed?

Look and Feel
HTC has managed to stay somewhat consistent with last year's breakaway design, but for some reason the One (M8) isn't as attention-grabbing as its immediate predecessor. We constantly find ourselves comparing it to the One (now retconned to M7) and finding ourselves underwhelmed. The slick, sharp edges which gave the M7 a distinctly powerful air have made way to soft curves. The solid aluminium now has a brushed pattern which, at least on our gunmetal grey review unit, didn't feel as premium.

HTC's aesthetic is still miles ahead of the competition, though. The M8's front face is minimalistic and clean, with only a small silver company logo breaking from the dark glass and metal. There are grilles above and below the screen for HTC's trademark BoomSound speakers, and the notification LED is as usual hidden behind the upper one. Thanks to a switch to on-screen buttons, the M7's awkward two-button setup has been dispensed with.

The top of the M8 has an unusual plastic strip, which makes it looks somewhat like a remote control. In fact, the plastic hides an infrared emitter which can be used to control TVs and other home electronics. The power button is also located up top, rather than the newer, more fashionable spot on the right edge. Many people now prefer the power button to be on the right edge, and you might find this placement inconvenient if you have small hands. The Micro-USB port and headset socket are on the bottom

The original single-SIM One M7 had a sealed unibody construction, and prioritised aesthetics by omitting a microSD card slot. The dual-SIM variant that replaced it in India had a removable rear panel, making it less slick, but allowing space for two SIM cards and a microSD card. The M8 goes back to a sealed body, but there are now trays on either side for a SIM and a microSD card. On our review unit, the microSD tray on the right edge was slightly raised, and unfortunately we kept hitting it as if it was the power button, since it's right above the volume rocker.

But by far the most interesting physical aspect of this phone is the rear, thanks to the addition of a second camera. It's definitely an unusual thing to see, especially since the two cameras look quite different. Luckily, they're placed in such a way that your fingers won't easily cover either lens.


The M8 will be available in silver and grey, with a pale gold model coming a little later, and it's hard not to see reflections of the iPhone 5s range in HTC's palette. The gold variant should have quite a few fans in India.

We've become so used to plastic bodies that it was often surprising to feel how cold the HTC One (M8) got when it had been left in an air-conditioned room, and how hot it felt when we just had it in our hands outdoors.

Features and specifications
The M8 comes to market with Qualcomm's latest and greatest Snapdragon processor, the 801. This is a slight speed bump over last year's flagship Snapdragon 800, but HTC used the lower-end Snapdragon 600 with the M7 so the performance gulf will be more significant.

Interestingly, the M8 in India has a higher clock speed; 2.5GHz as opposed to 2.3GHz in other markets. HTC says this is because Indian consumers are more concerned about specifications. It's also worth noting that HTC, after being criticised for manipulating benchmark scores, has decided to expose an option for a "High Performance Mode", which bumps up the clock speed for all applications. This doesn't mean that speed boosting is disabled with the option off, though. We'll investigate more when we get to the benchmarking portion of our review.

The HTC One (M8) comes with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of built-in storage, which can be expanded using a microSD card. The battery is rated at 2,600mAh, which is adequately beefy. Wi-Fi b/g/n/ac and Bluetooth 4.0 are standard, and there's also an infrared emitter and receiver, FM radio, and the usual array of sensors.

The 5-inch 1080x1920-pixel screen is noticeably larger than the M7's 4.7-inch one, and it's really a matter of personal preference to call one better than the other.

The M8 runs Android 4.4.2, with HTC's Sense 6 interface on top. This version of Sense is definitely more minimalist than previous versions. In stark contrast to Samsung's often over-the-top colours and abundance of options, Sense feels almost Spartan.



By default, your home screen is the BlinkFeed magazine view, which aggregates articles from around the Web and social network updates. For some reason, the app dock and Android soft buttons remain visible on top of displayed content. Swiping to the right brings you to a more familiar home screen, with only a single weather widget and a Google search box.

You can unlock the phone with a double-tap on the screen, which will come in handy if you don't like the power button placement. Swiping to the left will take you to BlinkFeed, swiping to the right will take you to the first home screen, and swiping upwards will just unlock the phone and take you to whatever you were doing last. With the phone on its side, you can just press either volume button to wake up directly into the camera. You can also drag any of the lock screen icons upwards to unlock the phone and launch that app.


The app drawer has a stark black background, and pages are separated vertically rather than horizontally. You can sort icons in alphabetical order, by date, or in your own custom arrangement. You can also choose between a 4x5 grid and a more spaced out 3x4 layout, though icon sizes don't change.

HTC also doesn't bundle very many apps. There's a Car Mode, which shows larger versions of the music controls, maps and phone dialler, as well as a Kid Mode that lets you restrict what a child can do when you give him or her your phone to play with. HTC also includes the 7digital music store, which is largely unusable in India; the Fitbit app, for users of Fitbit health bands; WeChat; Polaris Office 5; and a sketching app called Scribble.

The Television app uses the M8's infrared LEDs to control your TV, set-top box and home theatre receiver. The list of manufacturers included lots of Indian DTH and electronics brands, but channel guides are not available. In case your devices aren't supported, you can use their original remotes to program the M8 manually.

Very similar to Samsung's Galaxy S5, there's a power saver mode as well as an extreme power saver mode. While the former adjusts settings such as the screen timeout and background data transfers, the latter essentially turns the M8 into a basic phone which only lets you make use the calling, text messaging and email functions. The mode isn't quite as minimalistic as Samsung's implementation, but you can choose to automatically trigger it when your battery drops below the 5, 10 or 20 percent charge level.

Dual camera
We couldn't wait to test the much-hyped dual-camera functionality. HTC doesn't say much about the specifications of the second camera, and indeed you can't record pictures or videos through it. It's much more of a sensor, and is included in order to add extra context to photos taken with the primary camera. You won't get stereoscopic 3D effects or photos, but you will be able to make some very neat edits, which aren't possible with regular cameras or even regular PC software.

HTC is also still sticking to its UltraPixel technology (and marketing), which eschews high pixel counts in favour of expanded sensors which capture more light per pixel. By ordinary metrics, that means the One M8's camera has a piddly 4-megapixel sensor compared to the 16 megapixels of its competitors, but in practice, there is merit to HTC's approach.

Photos taken by the M8 are surprisingly detailed and clear. Most remarkably, there's very little loss of detail and almost no visible compression when seen at full size, which cannot always be said for photos taken with phone cameras. However, we found that colours were very muted and dull, even in broad daylight. The M8 also emits a very loud chirping noise when it locks focus, which seems totally unnecessary.

(Click to see full size)


The M8 camera excelled while taking shots from a moving car. With a fixed aperture, shutter speed has to be reduced to avoid blurring when in motion, which automatically means less light is captured. We were able to take beautiful, crisp shots with the M8 automatically adjusting to speeds as high as 1/2860 of a second. Similarly, low-light performance was remarkable. The M8 captured decent amounts of detail and colour with just faint illumination, though we needed a steady hand.

The 5-megapixel front camera was a bit of a letdown, considering it's actually capable of taking larger photos than the rear one. Images weren't always well exposed, and there was a lot of compression. As far as video goes, 1080p is a big step down from 4K, which the M8's prime competitors offer. Video is quite clean and smooth, but not spectacular.

(Click to see full size)

The dual-camera tricks only come into play when editing photos. The possibilities are quite impressive, and make for excellent demonstrations, but after a while we're left wondering how often we'd actually use them. The most impressive is the copy/paste feature, which lets you extract people from backgrounds and rearrange them in other photos. This doesn't just mean you can paste one photo on top of another; even the target photo is analysed, and the person you're inserting can be between people and their backgrounds. Effectively, you get three layers, and can choose who is in front and who is behind.

Of course it isn't perfect, and a lot depends on the angle you shoot at. It also only works on photos with recognisable faces.Automatic selections work best with high-contrast backgrounds, but you can refine the selection area manually. The effect, when done right, can be quite amazing, but more often than not, it's just comical.





Other effects include selective defocus, which adds a fake depth of field effect. You just have to tap any part of the screen that you want to focus, and the rest blurs around it. Foregrounder is somewhat the same, but instead of a DoF blur, other effects such as motion blur or cartoon sketch filter can be applied.

The Seasons effect is the least interesting, since you'd have to save your photos as videos to capture the pattern of falling petals or snowflakes, which honestly looks very fake. Dimension Plus lets you tilt your photos around for a 3D effect, which again works only so long as subjects are the right size and distance.

Many of these features won't work if the secondary camera was obstructed when you took a photo. Clearly, that depth-sensing capability has been harnessed here, but we have to wonder if it's worth the cost, since everything feels quite gimmicky. We're not likely to use these effects often, once the novelty wears off.

Performance
This is our first opportunity to benchmark a device based on the new Snapdragon 801, since Samsung launched only the Exynos-based variant of its Galaxy S5 in India. While the Exynos has four high-powered and four low-powered cores, the Snapdragon has only four, but more powerful and running significantly faster.

The Galaxy S5 and the One (M8) showed different strengths, but more often than not, it was the M8 that came out on top. Qualcomm's advantage over other ARM-based processor vendors has so far been graphics, and we saw that continue to be the case despite Samsung's impressive work with its in-house processors.

Of course, there's HTC's High Performance Mode to be accounted for. There's no real way to be sure which devices are and aren't optimising performance for which benchmarks, and despite giving us the (slightly hidden) option to turn it on for all apps, there's no way to make sure it's off for the purpose of benchmark accuracy. We ran our entire suite of tests with High Performance on as well as off, and saw only negligible differences. This could mean that our scores are inflated, so we're choosing not to report individual numbers here.

Instead, it should suffice to say that the M8 is a phenomenally fast phone, with the fastest processor currently available. Games are incredibly smooth, high-def videos play flawlessly, and we only noticed slight lags when applying photo effects, which is probably very CPU-intensive.

HTC's BoomSound speakers also deserve a mention here. Music and movies were both rich and detailed. The volume doesn't go high enough to fill a room, but it's more than enough for a group of friends clustered around you.

Call quality was decent, and so was network reception in most areas. The battery lasted 10 hours, 5 minutes in our video loop test, which is pretty impressive.

Verdict
The HTC One (M8) is not a radical departure from last year's HTC One. It's a solid update, but isn't new or exciting, and definitely isn't worth upgrading to if you currently use any of last year's premium phones.

The M8's major competition will come from Sony's Xperia Z2 and Samsung's Galaxy S5, both of which offer similar or better specifications. The M8 will have to rely on its premium build quality and camera gimmicks to appeal to buyers, and perhaps a price cut sometime mid-lifecycle. Meanwhile, Samsung and Sony are experimenting with (and making big noises about) waterproof bodies, heart rate sensors, 4K video recording, fingerprint readers, smart accessories, and much more. This is exactly the strategy that led HTC to where it is right now, and it looks like history might well repeat itself.

Ultimately, despite being a fantastically crafted phone that works really well, the M8 will appeal only to those who either place a high value on design, or seriously dislike Samsung and Sony. We're less enthusiastic about the M8 than we are about the inevitable price cut the M7 will receive. HTC seriously needs a reinvention, and the One (M8) is not it.


Display

5.00-inch

Processor

2.5GHz

Front Camera

5-megapixel

Resolution

1080x1920 pixels

RAM

2GB

OS

Android 4.4.2

Storage

16GB

Rear Camera

4-Ultrapixel

Battery capacity

2600mAh

HTC One (M8)

Rs. 49990

  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery life
  • Camera
  • Value for money
  • Good
  • Metal body and good construction quality
  • Camera works brilliantly in many conditions
  • Good pricing
  • Bad
  • Clunky software and interface
  • Camera tricks are mostly comical
  • A bit big and unwieldy











Mumbai-born IIT Madras alum Vic Gundotra, the mastermind behind Google's social network Google+, has abruptly resigned putting a question mark on the future of his creation.

Google+'s former head, Vic Gundotra

Making the announcement via a posting on his own Google+ page on Thursday, Gundotra, 45, said he was proud of his eight year tenure with the online search giant, but felt that now was the time to look ahead. However, he didn't say much about his future plans.

"I am excited about what's next. But this isn't the day to talk about that. This is a day to celebrate the past 8 years," wrote Gundotra, who was Senior Vice-President, Social for Google in a post titled, "And Then."

"I'm also forever in debt to the Google+ team. This is a group of people who built social at Google against the scepticism of so many."

His departure follows a rumour posted two days ago on the app Secret that, "Vic Gundotra is interviewing," according to technology site CNet.

Citing a person familiar with the matter, it said that Gundotra had problems with Google's management team.

CEO Larry Page praised Gundotra in his own Google+ post, thanking him for "a tremendous almost eight years at Google" and for building Google+ "from nothing."




"I really enjoy using Google+ on a daily basis, especially the auto awesome movies which I really love sharing with my family and friends," said Page.

In addition to spearheading the development of Google+, Page congratulated Gundotra for his work on guiding the teams that introduced turn-by-turn navigation to Google Maps, and improving Google's developer relations, which Page described as "disparate efforts" before Gundotra fixed them.

However, his tenure was also a rocky one, according to CNET. Soon after the launch of Google+, Gundotra came under heavy criticism for insisting that Google+ users must display their real names, as opposed to pseudonyms.

Gundotra came to Google in 2007, following a 16-year stint at Microsoft as a general manager and a year off working on charitable causes.

Gundotra has not revealed where he will be going, although his abrupt departure indicates that he could be going to a competitor, CNET said.

The future of the social network that Gundotra founded is almost as unclear as Gundotra's next move, it said.

Going forward, Google+ will not be led by Gundotra's right-hand man and the social network's product manager Bradley Horowitz, reported Recode.

Instead, Google confirmed that Google+ Vice President of Engineering David Besbris will take command of Google+.

What Besbris' plans for Google+ are as-yet unknown, CNET said. There's been a lot of speculation that popular Google+ services like Photos will be broken off and the social network will be re-purposed as a platform.

However, Google "vehemently" denied the rumours to CNET.

"Today's news has no impact on our Google+ strategy-we have an incredibly talented team that will continue to build great user experiences across Google+, Hangouts and Photos," a Google representative was quoted as saying.

Google+ was launched in 2011 as Google's first foray into the expanding sector of social media, and was meant to compete head-on with leaders Facebook and Twitter.

As of last year, Google+ had 540 million active users, putting it ahead of Twitter's user base around the time but only about half of the over 1.2 billion active Facebook users around the world.

(From IANS)


Today, depending on your perspective, we either mourn the loss of one of the most important phone makers ever, or celebrate that the people behind so many iconic phones will continue to work under the Microsoft flag.As Microsoft, Nokia, and any number of regulatory authorities get to work on finalizing the $7.3 billion deal that will see Microsoft buy Nokia's devices and services division, take a moment to look back at some of Nokia's most beautiful, important, and bizarre creations.



Although it was by no means the first phone from Nokia — to go way back, you can take a look at the fantastic Nokia Museum — the 1011 was a very important handset. Released in 1992, It was Nokia's first to run on a GSM network, and so can be seen as the first "modern" phone from the company.


The Nokia 2110 was not only the company's first to feature the now-famous Nokia ringtone, but it was also the first phone Verge editor-in-chief Joshua Topolsky ever owned. On the right is the Nokia 6110, the first cellphone used by Verge editors Thomas Ricker and Laura June.


Originally released in 1996, the Nokia 8110 (image credit: Unlock Unit) was a business-oriented device with a mechanical slider. Three years later, it featured heavily in the 1999 movie The Matrix, further driving Nokia's popularity at the time.


In 1996, Nokia unleashed the Communicator 9000 on an unsuspecting world. With a full QWERTY keyboard, a 24MHz processor, and a giant 4.5-inch display, the original Communicator was every businessperson's dream.


1999's 8210 represented a huge accomplishment for Nokia's engineers. The tiny handset had an internal aerial — an unusual feature in 1999 — and weighed just 79g. Despite its size, the 8210 still had advanced features like an infrared port for contract exchange and two-player 'Snake.'


The Nokia 3310, the sequel to the taller 3210, took the 8210's aesthetic and added some heft. The 3310 struck the perfect balance between desirability and affordability, and Nokia went on to sell over 125 million worldwide.


The 7650 was the first phone from Nokia to run Symbian, the OS all its smartphones would run for many years, and also the first to feature a camera.


The Nokia 6800 is one of many examples of Nokia throwing a curveball. A candybar handset that unfolded to reveal a full QWERTY keyboard, the "butterfly phone" and its successors were popular in their day.


The short-lived N-Gage line was a serious attack on Nintendo's handheld gaming monopoly. The first N-Gage bizarrely had its microphone and earpiece mounted on the side of the device, leading to much "sidetalking." With the release of the N-Gage QD, pictured above, Nokia saw sense and mounted the earpiece on the device's front.


The 2003 Nokia 7600 doesn't represent a massive milestone for the company — although it was one of the first 3G phones from the company. Instead, it's an opportunity to take in one of the company's most outlandish designs.


Released mid-2004, the 7610 baffled users' thumbs everywhere thanks to a distinctive keypad layout.


Presenting the 7280. Say what you will about Nokia, but it's never been afraid to experiment. Announced in 2004 and affectionately known as "the lipstick phone," this Symbian handset had no number pad, no touch screen (it was 2004), and very few sales.


The 7710 was Nokia's first attempt at a touch screen device. In 2004, the strange shape and lack of a keypad confused many, and the device failed to gain traction.


The 9300, released 2005. This was Nokia's attempt to bring its business-oriented line of Communicator smartphones to the mass market. It retains the Communicator series' signature design, but was never marketed as a Communicator.


Released in 2005, the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet was the company's first device to run on Maemo (later renamed MeeGo), the operating system that was supposed to be the future of the company.


The Nokia N93. Released July 2006, it's one of Nokia's many experimental form factors. With a Carl Zeiss lens, the N93 was marketed as an all-in-one smartphone and camcorder.


The Nokia N95. Perhaps the original "iPhone killer," this Symbian handset was Nokia's big release for 2007.


In 2009, the N97 was Nokia's halo device. A big screen like the iPhone, a quality keyboard, what could go wrong? Lots.


If the N95 and N97 were the answers to the iPhone, the E71 was unmistakably an attempt to defeat BlackBerry. Praised for its high build quality, the E71 was let down by the then-aging Symbian OS.


The Nokia X7 (the X stands for "Xpress") was the first X-Series handset to run Nokia's Symbian^3 operating system. Symbian^3, later renamed "Anna" and then "Belle," was the last iteration of Nokia's Symbian.


Look familiar? The Nokia N9 was the company's brave new hope in the fight against Android and iOS. It introduced the now-familiar Nokia Lumia polycarbonate shell, but rather than Windows Phone, ran the MeeGo Harmattan OS. Released in 2011, it was the last major release before Nokia made the jump to Windows phone.


The 808 PureView is a phone of milestones. The last Symbian phone, the first PureView phone, and still the owner of the record for "largest sensor in a phone."


And so we enter the age of the Lumia. After the leak of the infamous "burning platform" memo, Stephen Elop moved Nokia over to Windows Phone, and the Lumia 800, essentially a reworked N9, was released in November 2011.


CREDITS - VERGE